Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Budd v. Williams

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 19, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause is before us on demurrer to petition for prohibition on which rule nisi heretofore issued.

It is admitted by demurrer that Respondent Circuit Judge entered an order purporting to correct a final decree which had theretofore been affirmed by this Court (See Budd, et al., v. Gooch, 151 Fla. 262, 9 So. (2nd) 633).

When the decree of the circuit court was affirmed by this Court, such decree was merged and became the judgment and decree of this Court. Bloxham v. Fla. Cent. etc. R. Co., 39 Fla. 243, 22 So. 697; Palm Beach Estates v. Croker, 106 Fla. 617, 143 So. 792, 794. After affirmance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palm Beach Estates v. CrokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Bloxham v. Florida Central & Peninsular RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  3. Budd, Et Ux. v. J. Y. Gooch Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Milton v. KeithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Tobin v. HoltDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Eisenburg v. CornblumSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  4. Wood v. Manatee Bay Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Jeromee Saffold v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API