Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gannett Co., Inc. v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 22, 1990Published

1DissentWalsh, Justice

The majority today holds that a court may deny the public and the press access to the names of jurors impanelled in a criminal trial, as a matter of discretion, without balancing the public’s right of access against the threat to a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.. The United States Supreme Court has recognized that the public’s right of access to judicial proceedings is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.1 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 100 S.Ct. 2814, 65 L.Ed.2d 973 (1980); Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API