Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farmers Bank v. Eledge

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 10, 1923No. 11368Published

1DissentJustice Coti-iran

(dissenting) : Action for $131.70 and interest, growing out of the following transaction :

During the year 1920, the defendant Eledge was a tenant upon a place which belonged to the defendant Allison. On March 5, 1920, Allison wrote, a letter to the plaintiff back, as follows:

“Mr. Eledge. will want about $125 to make a crop on. If you will let him have it, I will sign note with him, oblige.”

On April 5, 1920, Eledge applied to the bank for a loan of $125, and exhibited Allison’s letter. Upon the strength of that letter the bank let him have $125, and had him sign a note for $131.70, payable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  2. French v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Lorick & Lowrance v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  4. Gaines v. DurhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Robertson v. HunterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API