Legal Opinion
RINKER PORTLAND CEMENT CORP v. Seidel
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 1, 1982No. 82-627PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
414 So.2d 629 (1982)
RINKER PORTLAND CEMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner,
v.
William D. SEIDEL, Trustee of F.C.M. Corporation, Respondent.
No. 82-627.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 1, 1982.
Dale A. Konigsburg, Lake Park, for petitioner.
Schatzman & Schatzman and Arnold Schatzman, Miami, for respondent.
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
FERGUSON, Judge.
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order denying its motion to dismiss a complaint based on a contract, terms of which required the parties to arbitrate disputes. We have jurisdiction.[1]
The filing of a proof of claim…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Vic Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc. v. BloomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Lapidus v. ARLEN BEACH CON. ASSOC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Balboa Ins. Co. v. WG Mills, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Public Health Trust of Dade County v. M.R. Harrison Construction Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- US Fire Ins. Co. v. FrankoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Graham Contracting, Inc. v. Flagler CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- RIVERFRONT PROP. LTD. v. Max Factor IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Hirschfeld v. Crescent Heights, X, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Hardin Intern., Inc. v. Firepak, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.