Legal Opinion

In Re Gomez

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 2007No. B197980Published

1Opinion of the Court

64 Cal.Rptr.3d 281 (2007)

153 Cal.App.4th 1516

In re Sotero GOMEZ, on Habeas Corpus.

No. B197980.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two.

August 7, 2007.

Vincent James Oliver for Petitioner Sotero Gomez.

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence M. Daniels and Carl N. Henry, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent the People.

BOREN, P.J.

In Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (Apprendi), the United States Supreme Court held that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API