Legal Opinion

Mack v. Kent County Vocational & Technical School District

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 19, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 88-223 MMSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

This is an employment discrimination action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Plaintiff Emma Ree Mack is a black woman who was employed by defendant Kent County Vocational and Technical School District (the “School District”) as a cosmetology instructor. The School District is an agency of the State of Delaware. At all times material to this suit the School District employed more than fifteen employees and is an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Abraham WELDON, Appellant, v. KRAFT, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mack (Emma Ree) v. Kent County Vocational Technical School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API