Legal Opinion

Melli v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

There are twelve assignments of error. The first and second may be considered together. They are, (1) that “the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict because of reasonable doubt as to whether defendant fired fatal shot,” and (2) that “the court erred in refusing to set aside verdict because intent to kill necessary to first degree murder was not established beyond reasonable doubt.” We do not deem it necessary to enlarge on the statement of facts. The evidence is voluminous. There is a sharp conflict between the evidence adduced by the state and that given by the defendant and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Cupps v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Parke v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Ryan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. WellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. Hancock v. HallmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. HanksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API