Legal Opinion

United States v. Forfeiture, Property, All Appurtenances & Improvements

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 27, 1992No. Civ. A. 7-92-037-KPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BELEW, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of claimant John Amescua Garcia styled Introduction of Claimant, Petition for Counsel’ and Additional Time. Upon consideration of all pleadings, motions and applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that the motion is of merit and should be GRANTED in part. The motion is otherwise DENIED without prejudice to refiling at a later date if the conditions of representation are met.

This is an in rent forfeiture action against the property of John Amescua Garcia and Mary Lou Garcia. The property in this instance is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Jimmie Lee Branch v. Charles Ray ColeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. $80,760.00 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. GiraldoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. State v. $1,010.00 IN AMERICAN CURRENCYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. $9,847.00 U.S. CurrencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Bankhead v. Spence, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  5. People v. $30,000 United States CurrencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API