Continental Casualty Co. v. Adams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
While we recognize an error in the statement of facts (a statement indicating Adams had taken a bag of money with him) this does not enter into the result of the case. The sentence first occurs in the statement of facts of the single director, which was duplicated in that of the full board. Obviously, since the first award denied and the second granted compensation, the decisions did not hinge on the existence or nonexistence of this fact. Further, the Chairman of the Board of Workmen’s Compensation, over whose signature the award was written, did not include the words "arose out…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Ladson Motor Company v. CroftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Savannah River Lumber Co. v. BushCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Death of MaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- May v. Purolator Security ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. TriggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. TriggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977