Legal Opinion

State v. Henley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 2006No. A06A0896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

The State appeals the trial court’s grant of John Russell Henley’s motion to suppress computer equipment seized during the execution of a search warrant at Henley’s residence. Specifically, the State contends that the trial court erred in ruling that the search warrant was overly broad, in that the officers seeking the warrant did not have probable cause to seize Henley’s computer equipment. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

“Where, as here, there is no conflicting evidence as to critical facts, the de novo standard is appropriate.” State v. Lane.1 See Vansant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Walsh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walthall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API