Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. State Tax Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

On Rehearing

BAILEY, J.

Oral argument on the rehearing of this matter, following granting of petition of the defendants and respondents, State Tax Commission and members thereof individually, was practically limited to the question of whether the federal government has exclusive legislative jurisdiction over the site, within territorial limits of the state of Oregon, of the Bonneville dam project. The other contention stressed by the plaintiffs and appellants in their original briefs and at the first hearing, and decided adversely to them in our former opinion, was that in the work which they…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atkinson v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API