Legal Opinion
Oliver-Mercer Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Davis
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 2004No. Nos. 20030157, 20030158PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAKING, Justice.
[¶ 1] AquaConcept Technologies, Inc. (“AquaConcept”), Richard D. Davis, III, Joseph Hauer, and Berkley Strothman appeal a deficiency judgment granted -to Oliver — Mercer Electric Cooperative (“the Cooperative”) entered on April 4, 2003. Subsequently a final judgment was entered on August 22, 2003. We affirm the trial court’s denial of AquaConcept’s request for a jury trial. We reverse the trial court’s deficiency judgment and remand the case for the trial court to make a finding of the fair market value of the collateral at the time of sale. The trial court must also make a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hall v. Owen County State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Co. v. RoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- State Bank of Towner v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Whitehouse Plastics D/B/A Aladdin Amusement ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Conti Causeway Ford v. JarossyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- OLIVER-MERCER ELEC. CO-OP., INC. v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Oliver-Mercer Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Court of Appeals · 2005
- OLIVER-MERCER ELEC. CO-OP., INC. v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004