Legal Opinion
Brown v. Terhune
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 6, 2001No. C-98-2318-SIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND DENYING REQUEST FOR EVI-DENTIARY HEARING
ILLSTON, District Judge.
Currently before this Court is petitioner Paul Anthony Brown’s second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties have fully briefed the merits of this petition, and Brown has requested an evidentiary hearing. After considering the arguments of the parties, this Court hereby DENIES petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and DENIES petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing.
BACKGROUND
On February 18, 1992, at approximately 9:15…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allen v. StrattonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Allen v. StrattonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- (HC) Torres v. DucartDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019