Legal Opinion

Stribling Motor Co. v. Smith

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1943No. 35428PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Harrison had a judgment against the Stribling Motor Company in the sum of $1,380. The foundation of the judgment was unliquidated damages. C. C. Smith was Harrison’s attorney in the prosecution of that cause and the recovery of the judgment. Harrison agreed orally before suit to pay Smith for his services a contingent fee of one-third of the recovery. After judgment was recovered Harrison transferred in writing and filed in the cause an assignment to Smith of that interest in the judgment. Harrison was insolvent. At the time that action was begun and when the judgment was rendered Harrison…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. Hazlehurst Oil Mill & Fertilizer Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Pigford Grocery Co. v. WilderMississippi Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Exchange Bank of Kentucky v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API