In re the Probate of the Will of Boyle
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
John D. Bennett, S.
The proponent seeks a bill of particulars of such of the contestants’ objections as allege a revocation of the propounded instrument.
Since Matter of Weisberg (286 App. Div. 849) it is well settled in this department that a bill of particulars may be demanded of a party as to those issues on which he has the burden of proof. It seems equally well established in this department that specific facts may be demanded where a bill of particulars is required (see 2 Warren’s Heaton on Surrogates’ Courts, § 184, par. 3; Matter of Ludlam, 154 N. Y. S. 2d 989, 990 and cases there…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Will of WeisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re the Estate of Van RiperNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Will of LenfesteyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
- In re the Estate of ReynoldsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
- In re the Probate of the Will of BuonoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958