Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Boyle

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 12, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

The proponent seeks a bill of particulars of such of the contestants’ objections as allege a revocation of the propounded instrument.

Since Matter of Weisberg (286 App. Div. 849) it is well settled in this department that a bill of particulars may be demanded of a party as to those issues on which he has the burden of proof. It seems equally well established in this department that specific facts may be demanded where a bill of particulars is required (see 2 Warren’s Heaton on Surrogates’ Courts, § 184, par. 3; Matter of Ludlam, 154 N. Y. S. 2d 989, 990 and cases there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of WeisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. In re the Estate of Van RiperNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of LenfesteyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  2. In re the Estate of ReynoldsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of BuonoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API