Rollins v. Armstrong

‡ — Peremptory mandamus order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs. Respondent proposes to erect upon his lot a building with the entrance wall facing the rear of the lot and the opposite or rear wall facing the street. He also proposes to make such wall facing the street thirteen feet higher than the Zoning Ordinance permits the “ front ” wall of a building in that district to be, although the wall of the entrance side, facing the rear of the lot, is within the permitted height. The height of the building must be…