Legal Opinion

Furnace v. City of Dayton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1954Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

The Town of Dayton was incorporated by a special statute enacted in 1915, Priv. Acts 1915, Chapter 152. It was virtually given a new charter by Private Acts of 1953, Chapters 46 and 267. Pursuant to the authority of these two statutes, the City Council did in May of 1953 elect Forrest D. Ftirnace, the appellant here, to the consolidated offices of City Recorder, Treasurer, Superintendent of Schools and City Manager, and provided that he “shall serve for a period of twelve months from the date hereof and until his successor is elected and qualified. ’ ’

At an election held in October under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Williams v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State Ex Rel. Bales v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Donathan v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hicks v. Rhea CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API