Legal Opinion
Kraus v. Congdon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1908No. 1,474PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Eastern District of Washington.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
As the facts in this case are set forth in the dissenting opinion in this case, it is unnecessary to state then: here. It is not contended in this court that a valid tax title to the premises in controversy was ever acquired by the appellants, but it is urged that the court below erred in ruling that the suit was not barred by that provision of the act of the Legislature of Washington, approved Dec. 1, 1881, which was embodied in the Code of that year as section 8,989. That section provides as follows:
“Any suit or proceeding for the recovery of hinds sold for taxes,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wilder v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Scorpion Silver Mining Co. v. MarsanoNevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Bird v. WinyerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harman v. LambertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Green Fili LLC v. United States Liability Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Vantage Mobility International LLC v. Kersey Mobility LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020