Legal Opinion

Williford v. Melbourne Commercial Development, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 1996No. 96-824PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

682 So.2d 1234 (1996)

Robert WILLIFORD, et al., Appellants,

v.

MELBOURNE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., Appellee.

No. 96-824.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 22, 1996.

James H. Fallace and David G. Larkin of James H. Fallace, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellants.

Patrick F. Roche of Frese, Nash & Torpy, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

Appellants appeal the temporary injunction order requiring them to remove their restaurant tables from the expanded deck area of a commercial condominium. We reverse because the order went beyond the scope of the relief sought.

Appellants own seven…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allegra Enterprises, Inc. v. FairchildDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Lee County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. CookDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Consolidated Pre-Stressed Concrete, Inc. v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stonely v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. Florida Association of Wholesale Distributors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Seminole County v. River Capital, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. Florida Association of Wholesale Distributors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API