Legal Opinion

Scottish American Mortgage Co. v. Reeve

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Traill County; Pollock, J. Action by the Scottish American Mortgage Company against Harriet E. Reeve and another. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, C. J.

The appeal is from a judgment rendered on default. The action is for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage. It is urged that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. That an appeal will lie from a default judgment is settled by our statute. Rev. Codes, § 5605. If the complaint is insufficient, the judgment must be reversed. All that a defendant admits by his default are the facts which are alleged in the complaint. At common law he could move in arrest of judgment when no cause of action was stated. In this jurisdiction he can accomplish the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Old v. MohlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Abbe v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cosgrave v. McAvayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Furman v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Scottish American Mortgage Co. v. ReeveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API