Legal Opinion

Warrick v. Liddon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1935No. 4 Div. 792PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a suit in equity to enjoin the negotiation of negotiable warehouse receipts for cotton, and to subject the cotton to the payment of a judgment in favor of complainant against the owner of the cotton. The cotton is claimed by Dean & Moore, who made a contract of purchase prior to the issuance of the injunction.

The material inquiry is whether such contract fixed a date on which to value the equity of redemption in the cotton so as to be exempt, and beyond the reach of complainant to satisfy his judgment, and whether the amount of the purchase price so agreed on was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Saunders v. KohnkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Pilgreen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Magee v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  4. Cook & Laurie Contracting Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Allen, Bethune & Co. v. Maury & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of SandeferUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985
  2. Nashville Trust Co. v. CleageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Samples v. GrizzellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API