State v. . Witherspoon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
In a prosecution for rape, where the question of identity is the principal issue involved, is it competent to impeach the credibility of the prosecuting witness by showing that she is mentally deficient or abnormal? The answer is, Yes. S. v. Ketchey, 70 N. C., 624; S. v. Vernon, 208 N. C., 340, 180 S. E., 590; 70 C. J., 763; 28 R. C. L., 617; Note, 82 A. S. R., 25. Compare S. v. Jenkins, 208 N. C., 740, 182 S. E., 324.
The principle is fully illustrated in the case of S. v. Rollins, 113 N. C., 722, 18 S. E., 394, where it was said: “The third.exception is well taken. John Jones, on behalf of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Clary's Administrators v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
- State v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. HedrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Moore v. New York Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- In re HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.