Legal Opinion

Rundel v. Keeler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1838PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the common pleas of Bradford county. William Keeler against Ensign D. Rundel. Appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace. The case is accurately stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Huston, J.

This cause commenced before a justice of the peace, and by his return it was a demand on assumption, and a promissory note was shown, daled the 19th day of July 1834, for 28 dollars 28 cents, payable in ninety days to William Keeler or bearer, with interest., and if sued, without defalcation or stay of execution. There was an appeal from the decision, and in September 1835 defendant, by his guardian, pleaded infancy. Replication, that it Was for necessaries.

To understand the case, we must recollect that in the several districts in this slate…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  2. Mohney v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  3. Huffsmith v. LeveringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  4. Hughes v. Gallans, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1874
  5. Rivera v. Reading Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API