Legal Opinion

Garcia Espinoza v. Huntsman Tree Supplier Inc

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 11, 2022No. 9:22-cv-01744Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION Victor Manuel Garcia Espinoza, ) Civil Action No. 9:22-cv-1744 ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Huntsman Tree Supplier, Inc. and Jack, ) ORDER AND OPINION Peck d/b/a Jack Peck Trucking, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 18). Both Defendants filed a response in opposition, (Dkt. Nos. 20, 21), and the Plaintiff replied, (Dkt. No. 26). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s motion to remand is GRANTED. I. Background In March…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pinney v. Nokia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  4. Sledz v. Flintkote Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  5. Cline v. J.E. Faulkner Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API