Legal Opinion

The People v. Lennie Frankline

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2016No. 89Published

1Opinion of the Court

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 89 The People &c., Respondent, v. Lennie Frankline, Appellant. Allen Fallek, for appellant. Jordan K. Hummel, for respondent. MEMORANDUM: The order of Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant Lennie Frankline challenges his conviction, alleging that the victim’s testimony about his prior act of violence against her, while generally admissible as nonpropensity evidence, was prejudicially excessive in scope. Given the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. People v. DormNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. People v. TillNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API