The People v. Lennie Frankline
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 89 The People &c., Respondent, v. Lennie Frankline, Appellant. Allen Fallek, for appellant. Jordan K. Hummel, for respondent. MEMORANDUM: The order of Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant Lennie Frankline challenges his conviction, alleging that the victim’s testimony about his prior act of violence against her, while generally admissible as nonpropensity evidence, was prejudicially excessive in scope. Given the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. DormNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. TillNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.