Legal Opinion

United States v. Espinosa

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 15, 1999No. 96-5208PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Fidel Espinosa, having been convicted by a jury of four offenses involving cocaine trafficking, appeals the sentences he received in the district court for those offenses. The only question he raises is whether the district court, in ruling on Espinosa’s request for a two-level reduction of his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 201.1(b)(6), 1 improperly deferred to the Government.

Section 2D1.1(b)(6) provides a two-level decrease for a defendant who meets the requirements of the safety-valve provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(l)-(5) (listed verbatim in U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2). At issue here is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. GambinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Emmanuell Obi MadukaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leslie James THOMPSON, AKA: Lester J. Thompson, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Krecht v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  3. United States v. HoneaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Ramiro Mancilla-IbarraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. FreemanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API