Legal Opinion
Conway v. Bowen
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 27, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 82-3396Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.
Plaintiff challenges an administrative decision that found that she was not disabled so as to qualify for Disability Insurance Benefits, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), or Widow’s Insurance Benefits. The parties have filed cross-motions for judgment. After carefully considering the motions and the record in this case, and for the reasons stated below, the Court affirms the Secretary’s decision as to the widow’s benefits, and reverses the Secretary’s decision as to the disability insurance and SSI claims.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a 64 year…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Claire McDonald v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Rose E. Brown v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Albert LAUER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.