Legal Opinion

Fulk v. State Compensation Commissioner

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1932No. 7385PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatoher, President:

The petitioner seeks here recognition of his claim for compensation, it having been rejected by the commissioner.

While at work in a glass factory, claimant felt a pain start in his right eye. He did not know of any injury to his eye but mentioned the pain to fellow workmen. The pain continued, redness ensued, and that evening he mentioned his condition to the safety director of the factory. A day or so afterwards claimant was examined by Dr. G. H. Tráugh (an eye specialist) who found a slight corneal abrasion (scratch) and considerable inflammation (iritis). The abrasion…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Staubs v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lively v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Ward v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bilchak v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API