Tallman v. Green

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for Green and Lane state in their brief that the sustaining of the general demurrers was not based “upon the theory that there can be jjut one proximate cause of an injury, nor on the theory that the negligence of the host [Lunsford] was attributable to the guest [Tallman], but on the theory that, as a matter of law, the act of negligence of defendant Lunsford was the superseding cause of the injury [sued for], beyond which the court will not look to determine liability.” In Adams v. Jackson, 45 Ga. App. 860 (166 S. E. 258), where the facts are…