Legal Opinion

Aetna Insurance Co. v. Giddens

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1972No. B-3120PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff recovered judgment for workmen’s compensation in an amount computed upon the basis of a jury finding of “just and fair” average weekly wage. The court of civil appeals affirmed. Tex.Civ. App., 474 S.W.2d 29. This affirmance was based on the holding that plaintiff produced evidence that his average weekly wage could not be computed under Subdivision (2) of Section 1 of Article 8309, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, and, in any event, failure to so prove must be considered harmless.

When a workmen’s compensation claim is made, the compensation rate cannot be computed until the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'N v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. ShannonTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Aetna Insurance Company v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. BewleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Garcia v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Crawford v. Standard Fire Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API