Legal Opinion

McColm v. Orebaugh

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1931No. 3843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, PJ.

Under the facts alleged in the answer, the following conclusions are reached by the court:

First: By the deed from Cyrus D. Mc-Colm reciting it to be in consideration of “one dollar and other good and valuable considerations,” Eva L. McColm, the second wife, became the owner in fee simple of the property in question by purchase.

Second: The real estate in question came to McColm, the intestate, from a former deceased wife Eva L. McColm, his deceased wife, by devise.

Third: McColm was the relict of Eva L. McColm, and died intestate and without, issue, possessed of the real estate in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Muckerheide v. ZinkHamilton County Probate Court · 1963
  2. Chupp v. TomasCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API