Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. Rankin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1951No. 4-9623PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smiti-i, Chief Justice.

Although the error thought by appellant to be sufficiently erroneous and prejudicial to justify a reversal is Instruction No. 7, it is necessary to show the essential facts in order to understand the instruction.

Ocus Rankin, with his wife and three children and a friend, were traveling in a general southernly direction toward Pine Bluff when Ocus, who was driving, observed a bus near the south end of the Biddle bridge. The bridge is a two-lane structure approximately 235 feet long and 18 feet wide. A center traffic line was marked on the bridge surface. Lawrence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. ShippSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Hearn v. East Texas Motor Freight LinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Kirby v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Rexer v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brand v. RorkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Beggs v. StalnakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Smith v. WittmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Seyfer v. Gateway Baking CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
  5. Browder v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API