Kendrick v. Rankin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Griffin Smiti-i, Chief Justice.
Although the error thought by appellant to be sufficiently erroneous and prejudicial to justify a reversal is Instruction No. 7, it is necessary to show the essential facts in order to understand the instruction.
Ocus Rankin, with his wife and three children and a friend, were traveling in a general southernly direction toward Pine Bluff when Ocus, who was driving, observed a bus near the south end of the Biddle bridge. The bridge is a two-lane structure approximately 235 feet long and 18 feet wide. A center traffic line was marked on the bridge surface. Lawrence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. ShippSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Hearn v. East Texas Motor Freight LinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Kirby v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Rexer v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brand v. RorkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Beggs v. StalnakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Smith v. WittmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Seyfer v. Gateway Baking CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
- Browder v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.