Legal Opinion
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Cannon Ranch Partners, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 31, 2014No. 2D14-827PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VILLANTI, Judge.
The Cincinnati Insurance Company seeks review of the order denying its motion to compel appraisal and abate litigation. 1 Because the matter in dispute is one subject to appraisal, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Cincinnati Insurance insures a piece of commercial real property owned by Cannon Ranch Partners, Inc. The Cannon Ranch policy includes coverage for sinkhole ■ damage. On August 14, 2012, Cannon Ranch discovered structural damage on its property and subsequently filed a claim with Cincinnati Insurance. Cincinnati Insurance sent a letter to Cannon Ranch…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
- State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. LiceaSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Green v. Life & Health of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Midwest Mutual Insurance Company v. SantiestebanSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Gonzalez v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3Cited by20 opinions
- Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. v. LustreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Norman David Freeman and Christy Ann Freeman v. American Integrity Insurance Co. of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Raymond Diaz and Surey Diaz v. Florida Peninsula Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. HunnewellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Barcelo v. Scottsdale Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.