Rutland v. Vaughn
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
1. Under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, “If an injured employee refuses employment procured for him suitable to his capacity, he shall not be entitled to any compensation at any time during the continuance of such refusal, unless in the opinion of the State Board of Workmen's Compensation such refusal was justified.” Code § 114-407. Keel v. American Employers Ins. Co., 44 Ga. App. 773 (1) (162 S. E. 847). Under the foregoing rule, where, as in this case, there was medical testimony by one of the doctors who had treated and examined the claimant that he could do some type of light work but…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Keel v. American Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
3Cited by3 opinions
- Employers Ins. Co. of Ala. v. AmersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. TitusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Turner v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965