Legal Opinion

Clark v. Human Rights Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 21, 1986No. 84-1487PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiff Joe Clark appeals from the circuit court’s affirmance of related decisions of defendant Human Rights Commission, and from the money judgment computed by the court on administrative review. For the purposes of this appeal, the defendants do not contest that plaintiff was a victim of racial discrimination in his employment by defendant Western Union Telegraph Company, and that he was entitled to reinstatement and back pay pursuant to section 8 — 108 of the Human Rights Act. (See Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 68, par. 8 — 108.) Plaintiff challenges remedial aspects of the decisions, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. 13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1035, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,260 Joe Stewart, Cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kallir, Philips, Ross, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. California v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. National Tea Co. v. Commerce & Industry InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Calabrese v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Clark v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Glenn v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. State v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. City of Belleville v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API