People v. James
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUYOLO, P. J.
I
INTRODUCTION
In a bifurcated trial, a jury found appellant Dennis Lamar James guilty of mayhem and assault producing great bodily injury, but then found him not guilty by reason of insanity. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on unconsciousness as a defense to all charges during the guilt phase of the bifurcated trial.
We conclude that the evidentiary record included substantial evidence that appellant was unconscious, within the legal meaning of the defense of unconsciousness, when he committed the offenses, and the trial court…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. Berg, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- (HC) Dun v. FisherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- P. DoaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. BergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. BilbreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.