Legal Opinion
James v. United States Customs & Border Protection
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 3, 2008No. Civil Action 06-562(RMC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Motion for a Writ of Mandamus, and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. See Dkt. ## 53, 56, and 65. Shanell James, proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, appealing the disposition of his records request by the United States Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), a component agency of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”). On February 23, 2007, this Court…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barnard v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Skinner v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Prison Legal News v. LappinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Zavala v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Bullock v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.