Legal Opinion

State v. Triplett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 7, 2017No. M19452; A159039Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, and for unlawful use or possession of inhalants, ORS 167.808(5)(a). Among the terms of defendant’s sentence, the judgment ordered defendant to pay, in addition to fines, a monetary award of $60 to the state on each conviction as a “Mandatory State Amt.” On appeal, defendant challenges the imposition of that monetary award, arguing that the trial court erred because imposing the award separately from the imposed fines was not authorized by any statute. The state concedes that imposing the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MachadoUmatilla County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API