Legal Opinion

Estate of Fish v. Ewing

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

We must review the judgment below under the established rule that the findings of fact of a trial judge will not be disturbed unless “against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Zolandek v. First Nat. Bank of Stevens Point, 212 Wis. 632, 250 N. W. 391. We are of opinion that under this rule we cannot overthrow the findings of the trial court.

The law governing the abandonment of homesteads has been recently so fully and clearly stated in Pedersen v. Nielsen, 212 Wis. 608, 250 N. W. 400, that we see no good reason for further statement or discussion of it.

The appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Myers v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Pedersen v. NielsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Bank of Waupun v. StormWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Zolandek v. First National Bank of Stevens PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Arndt v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  2. State v. DanielsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bauer v. Franklin State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. In Re BradshawUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1991
  5. Rameker v. Fettig (In re Fettig)District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API