Legal Opinion

People v. Mickewitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds (see, CPL 30.30). We conclude that the time period from July 28, 1992, when the police filed the accusatory iñstrument, to October 12, 1992, the date defendant was arrested and the District Attorney was first notified of the criminal action, was properly excluded as caused by "exceptional circumstances” (CPL 30.30 [4] [g]).

It is undisputed that the accusatory instrument filed on *1005July 28, 1992 was not forwarded to the District…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. LaBountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. SmietanaNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. AmrheinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. AMRHEIN, CHRISTOPHER M., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. AmrheinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. Hendryx, New York County Courts1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API