Legal Opinion

Duncombe v. City of Fort Dodge

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 29, 1874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, Webster Ci/rcuit Gourt. Action at law. There was a trial to the court without a jury, and a judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. The facts fully appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

— The judgment of the Circuit Court was rendered upon the following facts, which are disclosed by the record before us.

i municipal contract’byS officers. The plaintiff, a citizen of Fort Dodge, petitioned the council of that city to grade the public square, a common within corporate limits, proposing, as the warrants of the city were depreciated, in order to enable it to do the work, to advance th’e money necessary for the payment thereof, and receive therefor city warrants. Thereupon the council, being in session, accepted the proposition, and adopted the following resolution.

“ Resolved,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Indianola v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dillon v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  2. Duntz v. Ames Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Carlson v. City of MarshalltownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Wayman v. City of CherokeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Shelby v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API