Legal Opinion

Ray v. Davis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1969Published

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This proceeding was initiated by plaintiffs to obtain a statutory way of necessity under ORS 376.105 et seq. The case was tried to the court without a jury. Defendant Davis appeals from a judgment granting a way of necessity over his land.①

In the trials before the County Court and the Circuit Court various methods of establishing ingress and *157egress from plaintiff’s land to a public road were considered. Three methods were dealt with in considerable detail; these were described as (1) the Homestead Eoute which crossed defendant Davis’ land and which was designated as the statutory way of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fritz v. FritzOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Ray v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API