Legal Opinion

Biddle v. Pierce

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1895No. 1,712PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court:

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.

The controversy in this case is over the partition of certain funds in the hands of Crane and Anderson, trustees, of which appellant and appellees are the owners as the heirs of one Basil Tracy, late of Montgomery county, deceased. Tracy was a large property owner in said county, the father of eight children, some of whom had died when he himself departed this life, each leaving a child or children surviving. Before January, 1891, Tracy had from time to time made various advancements to his children and grandchildren, some of whom had received more than the others, such advancements…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. ButcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Dawson v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Sanders v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kerfoot v. KessenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sanders v. TownsendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Red Arrow Ventures, Ltd. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Baldwin v. HeilIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Koval v. Simon-Telelect, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API