Legal Opinion

Hall v. Dineen

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 16, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Case 61. — CONTROVERSY BETWEEN JOHN H. HALL AND EBLlEN DINEEN. MOTION TO CORRECT JUDGMENT ALLOWING TEN PER CENT. DAMAGES' UPON AMOUNT SUPERSEDED. Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court. Motion made in Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Response to-Motion by

Chief Justice Hobson.

The judgment appealed from herein, which was-affirmed, directs the master commissioner to pay to Ellen Dineen the sum of $620.72,' the balance found due her, out of the funds in his hands. Appellant superseded the judgment, and the clerk of this court, in entering the order of affirmance, so entered it as to give appellee ten per cent, damages upon the amount superseded. Appellant has entered a motion to set aside this part of the order. Sec. 764 of the Civil Code of Practice provides: “Upon the affirmance of, or the dismissal of an appeal from, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  2. Sumrall v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
  3. Worsham v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. Young v. BrucesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
  5. Woods v. RomanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1844

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coomer v. GrayKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bell's Trustee v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Big Sandy Commercial Bank v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Craig v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API