State v. McGinnes
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
The defendant was convicted of aggravated indecent liberties with a child. His constitutional right to be present at every critical stage of the proceeding was violated by the trial judge’s ex parte communication with the jury during its deliberation. The Court of Appeals concluded the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and affirmed. 24 Kan. App. 2d 921, 955 P.2d 1325 (1998). We granted the defendant’s petition for review and now reverse and remand for further proceedings.
In early July 1994, A.C., 8 years old, and her brother, C.C.,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. HerbelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. VerserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. MannSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.