Legal Opinion
Eighteen Associates, L. L. C. v. Nanjim Leasing Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 11, 1999PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for use and occupancy of a commercial building, the defendants Martin R. Kramer, Morton A. Schwab, and Mark A. Stofsky appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated October 9, 1997, as denied their cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellants, who formerly subleased office space in the plaintiff’s building, contend that the plaintiff may not recover damages for their use and occupancy of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rand Products Co. v. MintzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
- 19 West 45th Street Realty Co. v. Doram Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ministers of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1991
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fellin v. SahgalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Kasoff v. KVL Audio Visual Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Francis v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Vitello v. JAM Installers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Ferrarese v. USAA Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.