Legal Opinion

Hausling v. Hausman

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1887No. 12001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Placer County refusing to set aside a sale under execution. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an appeal from an order made by the Superior Court of Placer County, refusing to vacate and set aside the sale of a certain mining claim under a decree of foreclosure of a laborer’s lien, to restrain the sheriff from executing a deed of the property, and to enter satisfaction of the judgment and decree under which the sale was had. The decree was made and entered on the 21st of May, 1886, upon the complaint of plaintiff and the answer of the defendant, Hausman, in which answer all the facts alleged in the complaint were admitted, and judgment and decree confessed and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hausman v. HauslingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API