Legal Opinion

Ordenana v. Weber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for *581intentional interference with contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated February 5, 1999, as denied those branches of his motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the grounds of res judicata and failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The doctrine of res judicata operates to preclude the renewal of issues actually litigated and resolved in a prior proceeding as well as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Koether v. GeneralowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. D.C.I. Danaco Contractors, Inc. v. Associated Universities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Brown v. MilandoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Planet Motor Car, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2001
  2. Falco v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Ulysses I & Co. v. FeldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API