Legal Opinion
Peter Hearn v. Kevin Truesdale, et al.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided July 9, 2026No. 1:24-cv-00326Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO PETER HEARN, Case No. 1:24-cv-00326-DCN Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION v. AND ORDER KEVIN TRUESDALE, et al., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Naylor Towing’s (“Naylor”) Motion for Attorney Fees. Dkt. 65. Naylor asks the Court to award it attorney’s fees incurred defending against Plaintiff Peter Hearn’s action because the action was frivolous. For the reasons outlined below, the Court GRANTS Naylor’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Peter Hearn initiated this § 1983 action against numerous defendants for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.