Sullivan v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WHIPPLE, Judge.
Defendant, the State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD), appeals a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, Frank G. Sullivan, Jr. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The DOTD prepared plans and specifications and published invitations for bid on State Project Number 266-01-09, which involved construction of Louisiana Highway 22 from Interstate-10 to Sorrento, Louisiana. Sullivan Construction Company prepared and submitted its bid on this project, and bids were received and read (an event known as “bid…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O & M Construction, Inc. v. State, Division of AdministrationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Con-Plex, Div. of US v. La. Dept. of Transp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Paddison Builders, Inc. v. TurncliffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Rabenhorst Funeral Home, Inc. v. TessierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996